Penalty Waiver for Failure to Pre-Pay Penalties

By John G. Hodnette

The most common penalties assessed by the IRS are the failure to file and failure to pay penalties under Section 6651. However, another common penalty is the failure to pre-pay penalty assessed pursuant to Section 6654 where a taxpayer who is required to make quarterly payments fails to make the payments. Section 6651 penalties can be abated by a showing of reasonable cause and not willful neglect. In contrast, Section 6654 has very specific rules about when a waiver can be granted.

Section 6654(e) provides narrow exceptions for the failure to pre-pay penalty. First, subsection (e)(1) provides an exception where the tax shown on the return is less than $1,000.  Second, subsection (e)(2) provides an exception for U.S. citizens and residents who did not have any tax liability in the prior year. Third, subsection (e)(3)(A) provides a waiver may be granted where there is a casualty, disaster, or some other unusual circumstances that would cause the imposition of the penalty to be against equity and good conscience. That standard is unclear.

The fourth exception, which is in subsection (e)(3)(B), is for reasonable cause and not willful neglect, but only if the taxpayer either (a) retired after having attained the age of 62 within the year for which the estimated payments were required to be made or the year prior to such year or (b) became disabled within the year for which the payments were required to be made or the year prior to such year. Qualifying for either (a) or (b) does not automatically waive the penalty, but it allows the taxpayer to argue reasonable cause exists for a waiver of the penalty.

Equitable Distribution: Laws are Still Wrong, Says Ketan

Ketan SoniBy Ketan Soni

All the divorce laws are still wrong. Nothing has changed in the past 90 days. Only two people responded to my last post, and both basically said “Ketan, you are right.” I’m 2-0.

The softball issues are over. Remember, I’m trying to point out black holes in how things operate within our family law world.

After reading this next post, you can click here to send me your comments and change my mind.

Read more

Representing Your Clients Before Licensing Boards

By Andrew P. Atkins

If you regularly practice construction law, as I do, you are likely used to client requests for contract reviews, delay claims, defect claims, and the like. However, you may also find yourself receiving requests outside what we typically view as construction law – requests by your construction clients for assistance with licensing boards. With over 300 boards and commissions established in North Carolina, it is hardly surprising that the construction industry is subject to state licensure and regulation. This regulatory framework leads to a complex collision of construction law and administrative law.

Read more

November Update: Recent Article Highlights MVL Section, Plus Register for This Month’s CLE

By Jocelyn Mitnaul Mallette

With Veterans Day around the corner, I thought it would be timely to highlight the Military & Veterans Law (MVL) Section. The MVL Section was recently featured in Attorney at Law Magazine NC Triangle, Vol. 9, No. 4. The article highlights the work of our section and the important mission that drives our members. “When we needed them to safeguard our rights, these men and women answered the call to service. Now, it is our responsibility to protect their rights,” said Matthew Wilcut, past president of the section. Check out the full article in Attorney at Law Magazine here!

As a veteran, I am so proud to be a part of this section because of my fellow members. They are selfless legal professionals who are truly passionate about and committed to serving North Carolina’s military and veteran community. If you are interested in getting involved with the MVL Section or if you’re a legal professional who serves military members and veterans, join us on November 18 for a live webcast entitled “Helping Our Heroes: Representing Veterans Before the VA, BVA, CAVC and DoD.” This program will discuss a wide range of topics, including issues related to VA disability advocacy, military disability retirement pay, and early lease termination. This program has been approved for 7.00 MCLE hours.

Current president of the section, Patrick Wilson, reflected on the mission of the section in conjunction with the upcoming observance of Veterans Day stating, “We at the MVL especially value the occasion of Veterans Day to thank and honor those men and women in uniform who have sacrificed so much and that we take the opportunities available with the MVL to do right by them.”

Recent Amendments to the North Carolina Business Corporation Act

 Heyward Armstrong

Heyward Armstrong

David Clement

David Clement

Justin Truesdale

Justin Truesdale

By Heyward Armstrong, Dave Clement, and Justin Truesdale

The North Carolina General Assembly recently approved Senate Bill 507 (the “Act”),[i] which makes a number of significant changes to the North Carolina Business Corporation Act (“NCBCA”), and the governor signed the Act into law on August 16, 2021.[ii] Certain provisions of the Act were effective immediately, and the remaining provisions of the Act became effective on October 1, 2021.

The bill resulting in the Act was drafted by the Business Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section (the “Committee”) and approved as “Association-sponsored legislation” by the NCBA Board of Governors in January 2021. The North Carolina Bar Association is grateful for the endorsement and support of the North Carolina Chamber and thankful to the bill’s primary sponsor Senator Amy Galey and Representative Destin Hall who ably shepherded the bill through the legislative process to enactment.

Read more

Case Law Update: Waly v. Alkamary (UCCJEA)

By Rebecca Watts 

Waly v. Alkamary, Court of Appeals of North Carolina, August 17, 2021 (UCCJEA)

Father filed a custody action in North Carolina in July 2016. Then, mother relocated to New Jersey and father relocated to Florida. In October 2016, the North Carolina court entered a temporary custody and child support order in which mother was granted primary custody. The temporary order included a finding that “the parties should consider that since neither currently resides in Cumberland County, North Carolina: Cumberland County, North Carolina is no longer the most convenient forum for custody litigation.” In April 2017, mother obtained a domestic violence protective order against father in New Jersey – this order prohibited father from having any communication with mother and appointed mother’s sister as the go-between for facilitating custody exchanges. Also in 2017, the parties filed custody-related motions in the North Carolina case and in December 2017, the North Carolina trial court entered a holiday visitation order which referenced the New Jersey DVPO.

Read more

Case Law Update: Walter v. Walter (Contempt)

By Rebecca Watts 

Walter v. Walter, Court of Appeals of North Carolina, August 17, 2021 (Contempt)

The parties’ custody order provided, inter alia, that father would have “at least two non-consecutive weeks during each summer (school) vacation period of the minor children,” that father would give mother notice of his proposed summer time within five days of the time he made plans, that if father traveled out of town with the children he may need two consecutive weeks, and that mother would have summer vacation with the children “for at least one week during each summer (school) vacation period of the minor children.” In the summer of 2019, father exercised visitation with the children for two consecutive weeks to take them to Europe and then exercised another, separate week of visitation to take the children to Nebraska. Mother filed a contempt motion, alleging that father had violated the custody order by taking a third vacation week with the children. The trial court held father in contempt and father appealed.

Read more